Addressing Illegal Migration in Douglas County

Illegal migration is not a theoretical issue in Douglas County; it is a pressing reality that demands immediate attention and decisive action. As your state representative for House District 45 and a councilman for Castle Rock, I can confidently say that the policies currently in place have failed to protect our communities and uphold the rule of law.

The Biden administration’s failure to secure the southern border has left Colorado to deal with the consequences of poor immigration policies. Denver’s decision to welcome illegal migrants from Texas, compounded by its request for $90 million to fund an asylum seekers program, has brought approximately 43,000 illegal migrants into the state. This influx has turned what should have been a municipal decision into a statewide challenge, spreading across the Front Range and impacting every corner of Colorado.

The inability of local law enforcement to coordinate directly with immigration officials due to state legislation further exacerbates the problem. This restriction has effectively tied the hands of our law enforcement officers, preventing them from doing their jobs effectively. In Douglas County and Castle Rock, we firmly believe that law enforcement must have the tools and autonomy to protect our communities. We will always support our police officers and their ability to uphold the law without unnecessary interference.

During interviews, local citizens shared a range of perspectives on the issue. One resident emphasized the need to control who enters the country and ensure the process is legal. Another expressed concerns about mass deportations creating havoc but acknowledged the necessity of removing individuals who are here illegally with malicious intent. These voices reflect a shared sentiment: Coloradans value safety, security, and the rule of law.

I echo these concerns and stand firm in my commitment to work with like-minded officials and the incoming Trump administration to address illegal migration. Castle Rock and Douglas County will not hinder federal efforts to remove illegal migrants who pose a threat to our communities. This is not about rhetoric; it is about taking action to protect American homeowners, families, and communities from those who would do harm.

Denver’s decisions do not represent the entirety of Colorado, and they certainly do not reflect the values of Douglas County. We must unite as a state to secure our borders, empower law enforcement, and enact policies that prioritize the safety and well-being of Coloradans. As your representative, I remain steadfast in my mission to uphold these principles and ensure our communities are protected.

Sheriff Darren Weekly of the Douglas County Sheriff's Office has posted Detention Demographic Statistics on their website that is updated hourly.  At the date/time of this article (January 18, 2025, at 9:30 AM MST), there are 352 inmates of which 54 are non-US citizens - that's 15.34% of our county jail's total population.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

After SB25-003 Passed, One Constitutional Move Was Left - And It Was Ignored

Image
Last Friday, the Colorado Senate passed SB25-003 , the so-called “Semiautomatic Firearms & Rapid-Fire Devices” bill, as amended by the House – and with that vote, the legislation is now on its way to the Governor’s desk. It’s a deeply flawed and constitutionally questionable bill that infringes on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens, and I want to take a moment to explain just how hard Republicans fought this – and why our work is not done. When this bill came to the House floor, Republicans from all over the state stood together in a unified, tireless effort to defeat it. We brought forward dozens of thoughtful, reasonable, and constitutional amendments in good faith. We stayed on the floor until late in the evening, debating this bill with everything we had. I’ve never been prouder to stand beside my colleagues in defense of the Constitution, public safety, and the rights of law-abiding Coloradans. But after more than 13 hours of floor debate and every amendment ...
Read more

Why I Supported Home Rule - and Why the Fight for Local Control Isn’t Over

Image
When I first ran for office, I made a promise to represent the people of Douglas County with clarity, courage, and a fierce commitment to preserving what makes our community exceptional. That commitment led me to become a vocal supporter of the Douglas County Home Rule Charter. This initiative was never about rebellion. It was about resilience. Each legislative session at the State Capitol brings a new round of policies that pull authority away from local communities and concentrate it in Denver under the gold dome. From statewide zoning mandates that strip your elected county commissioners of land use authority, to top-down education reforms that disregard the values of local families, we are watching the slow but deliberate erosion of local control. Home Rule offered Douglas County the opportunity to push back intelligently, constitutionally, and proactively. Let me be clear: Home Rule is not a silver bullet. It doesn't give a county the power to defy state law or rewrite the Con...
Read more

The Majority’s Manipulation: How HB25-1133 Was Forced Through Committee

House Bill 25-1133 - a bill that prohibits the sale of ammunition to anyone under the age of 21 - should have died in the Business Affairs & Labor Committee. The votes were there to stop it. The arguments against it were clear and compelling. Yet, in a blatant act of political manipulation, the majority party ensured its passage by swapping out a "no" vote from their party for a member who had already signaled she would vote “yes.” When faced with losing a bill deemed “important” because its primary sponsor holds a leadership position in the majority party, they simply changed the committee’s makeup to guarantee the outcome they wanted. This is not how representative government should function. The bill itself is a direct infringement on the Constitutional rights of 18-20-year-old citizens. During the hearing, supporters argued that younger citizens could stand not exercising their rights in this instance. But that’s not how rights work. An 18-year-old can vote, enter in...
Read more