Law, Compassion, and the Proper Role of the Pulpit and the People

Recently, a post by Douglas County Watch criticized a sermon delivered by Pastor Bryan Fields of Grace Chapel Castle Rock and suggested that his message on immigration made its way into the Capitol through my remarks in the well of the Colorado House of Representatives.

Let me begin with this.

I am proud to be part of the Grace family. Grace Chapel provides spiritual leadership that calls us to lead in love and to stand firmly in truth. Pastor Fields’ sermons challenge me to grow in character, humility, and conviction. I value that influence. I embrace it. Faith should shape the moral compass of any serious leader.

At the same time, there is an important distinction between the pulpit and the well of the House.

A sermon calls people to spiritual transformation. A legislator speaks within a constitutional framework. When I rise to speak in the well, I do so under oath. My words are governed by the Constitution, statutory authority, and the duty I owe to every constituent, regardless of faith.

In my recent well speech on immigration, I opposed a resolution not out of hostility, and not out of indifference to human suffering. I opposed it because it failed to address the foundational requirement of any stable society: the rule of law.

A nation must enforce its laws. Without consistent enforcement, law becomes suggestion. When law becomes suggestion, order erodes. When order erodes, the most vulnerable suffer first.

Compassion and order are not opposites. They are partners.

Unsecured borders do not create mercy. They create opportunity for cartels, traffickers, and criminal networks. Weak enforcement does not protect immigrants. It often exposes them to exploitation. Law-abiding families, both citizens and legal immigrants, pay the price for policies that ignore structure and process.

My argument in the well was straightforward.

If you believe our immigration system needs reform, then reform it through legislation. Do not bypass it. Do not selectively ignore it. Change the law through lawful means.

America has always welcomed immigrants. We are enriched by their work, culture, and sacrifice. But we are also defined by ordered liberty. Ordered liberty requires standards. It requires equal application. It requires accountability.

Some critics suggest that moral language about immigration is inappropriate in public life. I disagree. Public policy is always grounded in moral assumptions. The question is whether those assumptions respect justice, equal protection, and constitutional governance.

Grace Chapel helps shape my character. The Constitution governs my legislative decisions.

There is no contradiction in that.

I will continue to speak clearly in the well. I will continue to defend the rule of law. And I will continue to be grateful for a church family that reminds me to pursue truth with humility and to lead with love.

That is not a conflict. It is alignment.

Comments

  1. I am in agreement with what you wrote and it is a wonderful argument against those who say enforcing immigration is inhumane.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I Supported Home Rule - and Why the Fight for Local Control Isn’t Over

The Case for Douglas County Home Rule

Third Time’s the ‘Chore’: Colorado’s "Special Session" Farce